When I first “cracked the code” on stabilizing and reversing prolapse, and wrote and published Saving the Whole Woman, I set up this forum. While I had finally gotten my own severe uterine prolapse under control with the knowledge I had gained, I didn’t actually know if I could teach other women to do for themselves what I had done for my condition.
So I just started teaching women on this forum. Within weeks, the women started writing back, “It’s working! I can feel the difference!”
From that moment on, the forum became the hub of the Whole Woman Community. Unfortunately, spammers also discovered the forum, along with the thousands of women we had been helping. The level of spamming became so intolerable and time-consuming, we regretfully took the forum down.
Technology never sleeps, however, and we have better tools today for controlling spam than we did just a few years ago. So I am very excited and pleased to bring the forum back online.
If you are already a registered user you may now log in and post. If you have lost your password, just click the request new password tab and follow the directions.
Please review and agree to the disclaimer and the forum rules. Our moderators will remove any posts that are promotional or otherwise fail to meet our guidelines and will block repeat offenders.
Remember, the forum is here for two reasons. First, to get your questions answered by other women who have knowledge and experience to share. Second, it is the place to share your results and successes. Your stories will help other women learn that Whole Woman is what they need.
Whether you’re an old friend or a new acquaintance, welcome! The Whole Woman forum is a place where you can make a difference in your own life and the lives of thousands of women around the world!
Best wishes,
Christine Kent
Founder
Whole Woman
louiseds
February 7, 2007 - 10:53pm
Permalink
one-sided article
Hi Mary Ann
Please do email BabyCenter.com . What they have written is a bit extreme for my liking too.
I have had a look at this article and followed it back to the original paper, the Astract of which is available from the website of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology which is available at their website. The paper itself is not quite so negative, but wouldn't sell any newspapers. I am reading between the lines that this team of researchers is not happy with current ways of treating prolapse, and not happy with the way Kegels are taught. I have emailed Professor DeLancey as a woman with prolapses, and hope to be able to discuss prolapse treatments with him.
I have tried very hard to express the appropriate humility in my email but I guess I will probably get the brushoff. You never know unless you try. It won't be my first knockback, and I am sure it won't be my last either ;-)
Cheers
Louise
louiseds
February 8, 2007 - 9:20pm
Permalink
one-sided article
Hey Mary Ann
Prof DeLancey emailed me back. He sounds like a reasonable man and certainly does not assume that surgery should be done for prolapse. He is keen to see more studies done on other ways of treating prolapse. I will keep up the correspondence and keep Christine informed too.
Cheers
Louise
spacetruck
February 10, 2007 - 10:17am
Permalink
i finally e-mailed!
thanks for your follow-up, louise. i finally sent babycenter an e-mail myself. i mentioned christine's work/book. (maybe they'll look into it & cover it in a future article -- a girl can dream...)i was interested to hear about the full article & its author. (you certainly are resourceful!) perhaps if we keep banging the drum, the rest of the world will wake up & listen.
louiseds
February 11, 2007 - 1:42am
Permalink
Tell the world
Yeah! Bang on!
Louise