abdominal muscle engagement mechanics

Body: 

I have been sitting here this morning on my computer stool pondering engagement of abdominal muscles.

When I lift my chest, I lift it from my lumbar spine first, going upwards. This makes my chest first go forwards, then up, then back. when I move my upper spine back, my shoulders stay forwards.

If I do the reverse, and tuck my chin and move my upper spine first, I can feel pressure in my vulva, and my belly protrudes first. My chest does a vertical circle but in the opposite direction, going down, back, up and forward. The latter method is very convoluted and does not feel at all intuitive to me. I will stick to the bottom up approach.

The other thing I notice is the way my different abdominal muscles literally switch on as my chest raises further and further. I think it is obliques that become quite hard first, then transverse abdominals deeper inside, then rectus abdominus last of all, which automatically springs into action at the last minute (boing!) and stops my chest rising any further. If you stand or sit with your thumbs at the sides of your waist and your hands at the front of your waist so your middle fingers are trying to meet up, then raise your chest, feel carefully for sensations under your hands and feel each muscle group engaging, one by one.

Then repeat the exercise, this time just concentrating on what is happening in your pelvic floor. The first thing I feel is a pulling sensation in my vulva, possibly the labia at the same time as my obliques engage. This may be the round ligaments pulling my uterus forwards, as Christine explained in another topic the other day. Then, at the end, when my rectus abdominus kicks in, my PF tightens longitudinally. At the end I can feel my tailbone being pulled forwards as my PF tightens.

(Is this right? I don't think the levator ani is joined to the tailbone, instead going around the back of the anus and forwards again, so that the anus gets pulled forwards. Why can I feel a pull on my tailbone? What muscles contract to allow the levator ani to relax and permit the rectum to move backwards and into line with the rest of the large intestine and to empty in a straight line? ie what is the LA's antagonist that pulls the rectum back for emptying ?)

The levator ani has to engage because (I think)it is the antagonist muscles of the rectus abdominus. When the RA contracts in response to chest raising, it tries to pull the pubis symphysis forwards. The LA says, "whoa back" and contracts to counteract the movement of the pubis symphysis. It is like a 'tug o war' mechanism. When one side relaxes, the other side relaxes. When one side contracts the other side contracts to keep the centre point of the rope (pubis symphysis) in its correct place.

If you tuck your butt, which counternutates the pelvis, it automatically loosens the pelvic floor (drumskin). Therefore the RA will automatically loosen as well because it no longer needs to remain engaged to keep the pubis symphysis back in its spot.

If you tuck your butt all the time your RA muscles will never be engaged during everyday movement, so they will lose tone and your belly will protrude. I think this is why fitness world is obsessed with exercises to flatten the belly!

Christine and other anatomy-curious Members, comments please.

Louise

Hi Louise,

I think it might be easiest to think of the pelvic floor muscles as extensions of the RA. Yes, the pubococcygeous muscles connect to the coccyx with what is called the levator plate. They might be considered one long set of muscles from lower jaw to tailbone, which happen to wrap around the pubic bones. They are synergistic rather than antagonistic, therefore it’s difficult to contract one without the other.

The paraspinal muscles act antagonistically with the abdominals, which we can feel by rocking the pelvis to and fro. The pulling forward of your tailbone that you feel is the tug-o-war between these two muscle groups.

My theory is that prolapsed women will ultimately teach the world of biomechanical science about pelvic stability, which all comes down to how intraabdominal pressure flows through the body. What is all this business about contracting the transverse abdominals, when it is their elongation that allows extension of the ribcage and lumbar spine?? It is a mystery to me how the world got so hung up on core stability. Oh yeah, the flat belly. :-/

Muscles are surely of primary importance in stabilizing the spine, but what about the contribution of the organs? When you breathe in, your lower ribs are significantly elevated and your organs pushed down and forward by the respiratory diaphragm. What stops that motion is resistance of the internal organs. The literature always says the abdominal organs, but we can sense that it is our bladder and uterus pressing into the lowest part of the abdominal wall that is the true resistance end-point.

If this one “little” concept were taught to women on a grand scale - as kegels have been taught - then women would be breathing their organs into their lower bellies, rather than trying to suck them up from an imaginary floor.

Cheers,

Christine

agonistic, not synergistic. :)

synergistic is accurate.

I think your comments all illustrate that we are one big structural system. Some of it is made of fascia and ligament, some is made of bone and some of muscle. They lever against each other to produce movement and stability.

Muscles can act synertistically, or as agonists or antagonists, but, because of the triangulated nature of all stable structures there are always more three structural members at work where there is stability. You cannot look at one muscle, bone or ligamentous structure in isolation. That is like clapping with one hand.

That's why these three words might all be right at different moments in time.

Lets just say that they are all in intimate relationship with each other and the skeleton and fascia, and they all have direct and indirect effects on each other.

L