When I first “cracked the code” on stabilizing and reversing prolapse, and wrote and published Saving the Whole Woman, I set up this forum. While I had finally gotten my own severe uterine prolapse under control with the knowledge I had gained, I didn’t actually know if I could teach other women to do for themselves what I had done for my condition.
So I just started teaching women on this forum. Within weeks, the women started writing back, “It’s working! I can feel the difference!”
From that moment on, the forum became the hub of the Whole Woman Community. Unfortunately, spammers also discovered the forum, along with the thousands of women we had been helping. The level of spamming became so intolerable and time-consuming, we regretfully took the forum down.
Technology never sleeps, however, and we have better tools today for controlling spam than we did just a few years ago. So I am very excited and pleased to bring the forum back online.
If you are already a registered user you may now log in and post. If you have lost your password, just click the request new password tab and follow the directions.
Please review and agree to the disclaimer and the forum rules. Our moderators will remove any posts that are promotional or otherwise fail to meet our guidelines and will block repeat offenders.
Remember, the forum is here for two reasons. First, to get your questions answered by other women who have knowledge and experience to share. Second, it is the place to share your results and successes. Your stories will help other women learn that Whole Woman is what they need.
Whether you’re an old friend or a new acquaintance, welcome! The Whole Woman forum is a place where you can make a difference in your own life and the lives of thousands of women around the world!
Best wishes,
Christine Kent
Founder
Whole Woman
ATS
January 30, 2008 - 3:14am
Permalink
Fantastic Sue
I wish I had thought of that and maybe should could have asked a few of us to be test subjects with different degrees of prolapse and if there are any troubles with slippage.
The only thing I did notice on the website was that it stated it should be replaced every month. I am guessing that means a whole new unit which would work out really expensive - £300 a year or nearly $600! If it worked some ladies might want to use it everyday whilst others it may be an occasional thing on bad days. I guess I will have to e-mail them myself and ask the question.
Will do that now.
Anita
MeMyselfAndI
January 30, 2008 - 3:18am
Permalink
Replacing
The lady said they have a ten year shelf life. That they are bound by UK laws to say to replace every month but silicone being an inert substance she told me this would not actually be the case (Will get more info from her on that)
I emailed her and said that we would need to test them on different types of prolapse to see if one prolase would not get any help from this whearas others might do...
I am assuming a uterine prolapse might push it straight out - But only testnig will tell with this...
As you say if this is occasional use and kept clean I really do not see why it would need replacing montly (Would help more if NHS prescribed them) I think she said they are wanting to sell them through Boots the Chemist.
Finally it looks like there is a light at the end of this dark tunnel!!
Will advise when I know more :-)
Sue
Look into the eyes - They hold the key...
http://www.bringmadeleinehome.com/img/maddy544x150Banner.jpg
ATS
January 30, 2008 - 3:23am
Permalink
Hi
I hope you don't mind but I have also e-mailed as I didn't realise you had already asked the question about replacement. But yes I agree those with uterine prolapse might find it just gets pushed straight back out. I do have a mild prolapse of the uterus but have never had a problem keeping tampons in so I am really hoping this might help on those bad days with discomfort.
I eagerly await your test results!
Anita
MeMyselfAndI
January 30, 2008 - 3:31am
Permalink
As do I
Just call me Guinea Pig Sue lolol
I had no problem keeping the tampon in yesterday - And this item is ribbed so should be ok.
This could be a fantastic thing for WW - I am feeling all teary eyed just writing it cos if this works - We have found a way to aid our posture. Posture has taken mine back to the edge - This Incostress is a better way than the Pessary ring as it won't stretch your innards to the edge of the world. This will give US the feeling of having choices in our own lives.
She said she might be able to link to WW on their website also (Fabulous as the more women who can avoid surgery the better)
She said she could come to a chat-type thingy (Youknow where women meet up and talk etc) I said that might be complicated as we are worldwide lol - She said she wouldn't mind going to USA lollllll
I think we all wouldn't mind but I don't have a passport and when I was going to go there a few years ago they stamped my old one cos they didn't believe I was coming back! (Hey I like living heremy family are here) lol
Anyways - The lady is lovely and very helpful.
:-)
Sue
Look into the eyes - They hold the key...
http://www.bringmadeleinehome.com/img/maddy544x150Banner.jpg
ATS
January 30, 2008 - 3:44am
Permalink
All sounds great
If it does work I really like the idea of the freedom we have of using it just when we need to and only having to pop it in like a tampon. Unfortunately as you know here in the UK pessaries have to be inserted and removed by a GP which I find unfair, they take our control away. Also, like you say, I don't want to be stretched inside.
Anita
MeMyselfAndI
January 30, 2008 - 3:53am
Permalink
Control - Freedom - POWER
Thats how i feel - That is why I am all filled with emotion and tears - I AM inside of all this disabilities and prolapse and stuff - a Powerful woman - A WHOLE WOMAN.
I hate the idea of Doctors choosing for me what is to be done with me (I get enough of that being disabled as it is!)
This wonderful creation. Could really free many hundreds of thousands of women all over the world from dibilitating surgery. As you say - alot of us have our worst days just before our periods - This would support us at that time.
I am assuming you cannot have a BM with this inside cos it would be pushed out - lollll
But as you say - Freedom. Freedom to have a life that a doctor doesn't have to tell you what to do when and you don't hafta believe their ideas of operations.
I am so pleased I tried that tampon yesterday - And that someone searched and found this site - It is a fantastic thing, and could be something HUGE in the world of WW.
As you say - As easy as inserting a tampon - That is easier than the sea sponges - easier than a real pessary - Just such a simple yet amazing little device...
Lets just hope it really works :-)
Sue
Look into the eyes - They hold the key...
http://www.bringmadeleinehome.com/img/maddy544x150Banner.jpg
Soupy
January 30, 2008 - 4:37am
Permalink
Hope it helps :)
It just rang a bell somewhere in the back of my mind when you described your tampessary! I read the article a few month ago in the paper and had a quick look on the internet, but because I don't have issue with incontinence either I didn't think any more about it.
I would think with the shaping it would stay in better than a tampon, I switched to mooncup after having my first baby as tampons wouldnt stay in any more. Don't think I had a prolapse then, just a non existent perineum! Oh what fun!
Anyway, I'm intrigued to know how your testing goes, I'm not having too many problems right now, but it will be nice to have another fallback just in case!
xxx
MeMyselfAndI
January 30, 2008 - 4:51am
Permalink
Yup
I wouldnt be using it for Incontience either. The ribs should hopefully stop it exiting (I hope)
This will be a very exciting testing methinks.
We would need women with al prolapses to test though.
I could for primary cystocele (Though i also have rectocele and uterine but they are not such a problem)
We would need someone wit rectocele mainly and uterine - Need to be like guinea pigs in a proper study - Make notes and give feedback back to the kind lady who would be helping us to be able to test these.
Would be also great PR for her company, and fabulous if they do work... :-)
Sue
Look into the eyes - They hold the key...
http://www.bringmadeleinehome.com/img/maddy544x150Banner.jpg
MeMyselfAndI
January 30, 2008 - 5:06am
Permalink
Such a shame :-(
She said...
Dear Sue,
I look forward to trying to help your situation. I have checked with quality control regarding your free sample, unfortunately I guess my eagerness to help was a little premature. We can not give out anything other than top quality product.
As soon as the rush is over and I have spare Incostress to give away I will send you a free saleable one in the post.
This will not be until the end of Feb beginning of March as we are completely sold out at the moment.
If you don't hear from me please send me a reminder email.
Kind regards
Guess we got a bit ahead of ourselves with the thought of having a testathon.
Quite depressing that really... She is a lovely lady though...
Sue
Look into the eyes - They hold the key...
http://www.bringmadeleinehome.com/img/maddy544x150Banner.jpg
goldfinch1
January 30, 2008 - 5:18am
Permalink
Instructions
Sue:
I just downloaded the instructions and read them (crazy me - always need facts and figures)! It says to remove the device Before emptying the bowels and Before urinating.
Maybe the pressure that it applies prevents an open flow of urine and therefore is why you are supposed to remove it first. Could you please ask the nice lady you have been talking to? It would be feasible using it at home, but not out in the workplace. Thanks.
Goldfinch
MeMyselfAndI
January 30, 2008 - 5:35am
Permalink
It says
It says somewhere on the site that to use it out and about to remove it to pee etc - If you cannot get to a sink to clean it etc Just take a bottle of water with you and rinse it.
I would like to see if i could pee whilstI had it in - I can with a tampon so would like to test also if you had a problem sometimes leaning forwards can 'tip the bucket' and help to pee.
I guess as our problem is different to the incontinence one - Things will be a bit of an unknown until someone has tested and seen...
Shame they are out of stock at present. I wanna test it out Nowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww...
Sue
Look into the eyes - They hold the key...
http://www.bringmadeleinehome.com/img/maddy544x150Banner.jpg
Soupy
January 30, 2008 - 6:36am
Permalink
in and out shouldn't be an issue
FWIW I don't think taking it in and out would be an issue...Presumably you look after the thing as you would a mooncup, cleaning with soap and water, or just rinsing in between uses depending on the facilities available and disincfecting otherwise (I boil the mooncup nightly which would be overkill to some, but I found I got thrush if I didn't)...
The incostress looks a lot less bulky than mooncup, and that isn't too bad to insert and remove once you're used to it. Though if I had been aware of POP when I was using it I would have done it even more carefully...(You have to break the vaccuum to get it out and sometimes I forgot...youch!)...I hope the two aren't linked...But I did remove the mooncup every time I went to the toilet to clean and empty it.
xxx
goldfinch1
January 30, 2008 - 7:52am
Permalink
Removal
If you read the article which Sue gave us a link to, the inventor of the device says "As well as closing the urethra and supporting the neck of the bladder to stop an involuntary leakage, the minor effort to keep the device in place strengthens the pelvic floor, by encouraging the muscles to work. Those with weak pelvic floor muscles may need to remove the device to urinate normally." So it closes the urethra - meaning it has to be removed for normal emptying of the bladder. As we've talked about before, its not good to leave urine in the bladder - infection, etc. It sounds remarkable if you're able to remove it when necessary. In my workplace, that would not be possible (too many people in the bathroom at any one time!) Wearing it at night sounds interesting - sort of the same idea that Christine mentioned of packing the va-a with organic cotton balls at night to push prolapse up, which I haven't tried yet.
Incostress
March 2, 2008 - 1:57pm
Permalink
Removal of incostress
Hi Goldfinch. Incostress does not hold urine in the bladder. It closes the urethra only enough to stop involuntary leakage. I am able to keep my incostress in place and urinate at the same time. It recommended to remove before urinating for the benifit of ladies with weak pelvic muscles. (Hence losing the incostress down the loo) Over time the Incostress may strengthen the muscles to a degree that over time there will not be need for the incostress. The muscles will close the urethra automatically. Hope this helps Gaynorx
Incostress
March 2, 2008 - 2:01pm
Permalink
In and Out isn't an issue
United we stand. Women supporting each other for a better quality of life
Incostress is not as fiddly as mooncup to insert or to remove. Incostress has a 'tail' which allows easy retraction. There is no suction element with incostress, so no 'owch' factor.x
www.incostress.com
ATS
March 2, 2008 - 2:28pm
Permalink
Are there any risks of
Are there any risks of damage to the vaginal skin with continued use. Pessaries have to be checked regularly and so I wondered if there were any risks with the Incostress in both pre and post menopausal women? Thanks.
Clonmacnoise
March 2, 2008 - 7:26pm
Permalink
How Big?
How big is this thing? Is it the size of a super tampon? The pictures make it look about the size of half a banana.
Judy
louiseds
March 2, 2008 - 9:48pm
Permalink
What about prolapsed pelvic organs?
Hi Incostress
This sounds like an interesting product. How could it help pelvic organ prolapse?
Cheers
Louise
Incostress
March 2, 2008 - 10:54pm
Permalink
United we stand. Women
United we stand. Women supporting each other for a better quality of life
Hi Louise,
Incostress has no evidience that it is suitable for a prolapse. It is designed to control stress incontinence by placing pressure on the urethra and allowing the bladder to be replaced in its normal anatomical position. Over time the shape of the Incostress could help strengthen the pelvic muscles.
I doubt if the incostress could be retained in the body with a prolapse. One of the members here has kindly offered to try it out to see if it actually will help. :D
Incostress has been clinically trialled at Singleton hospital - Swansea. Women with prolapses were excluded from the trial.
It will be interesting to see if it could help. But to be perfectly honest I don't hold much hope. This is why, I have set a tast to investigate and designe something which could help a prolapse. But as with anything of the medical nature it won't happen over night.
Incostress is a 10 year ongoing project!
Incostress
March 2, 2008 - 10:56pm
Permalink
United we stand. Women
United we stand. Women supporting each other for a better quality of life
Hi Judy,
Incostress is 5.5cm long and 2.5cm wide. (not even a mini banana's worth ;-)
Incostress
March 2, 2008 - 11:06pm
Permalink
United we stand. Women
United we stand. Women supporting each other for a better quality of life
Incostress is made of a medical grade silicone. The same silicone which is used in indwelling catheters. It has been passed through all the tests and is certified at a medical device.
Post menapausal women do have a thinning of the vagina lining due to the reduction of oestrogen. This can be combated by a vaginal oestrogen cream (prescribed by your doctor)
If the pelvic muscles are not strong enough the Incostress could slip. The constant pushing up of the incostress could evenually cause an irritation of the vaginal lining.
I would always recommend patients/customers to seek medical advice first. Take the information of Incostress to your doctor, if need be your doctor is welcome to contact me, where I would provide the clinical data.
One the www.incostress.com site there is a questions and answer page. Your question is on this page.
Due to the legal legislation Incostress may not be left inside the body continuously for more than 8 hours. It must be removed check and the body should rest for 1 hour before re inserting. Of course the Incostress may also be used for less than 8 hours. Some women only use theirs whilst exercising or shopping.
Hope this helps.
louiseds
March 3, 2008 - 4:27am
Permalink
United we stand.
Hi Incostress
Thanks for putting the information about your product on the Forum.
I personally don’t think that strength of the pelvic organs has an enormous role in bladder control, beyond the initial mobilisation of these muscles, and women becoming aware that they can utilise their tone to help with continence. That tone is maximised by stretching these muscles over a wider diaphragm like a drum skin, which happens when the pelvis tilts forwards slightly. Once the woman has learned to contract and move these muscles in response to bladder stress, I think that further improving their strength is secondary.
The muscle fibre type in the pelvic floor is not the type of muscle designed to bear weight. I believe that the pelvic muscle group is designed to allow things like urine, faeces and babies out, rather than holding things up or in. It is just too thin and stringy to be a platform for anything. It is more like a trampoline that will sag if weighted at all.
When a woman adopts what we describe as Wholewoman posture her pelvic floor muscles are not in a horizontal position, more diagonal, sloping upwards towards the back, so these muscles have to carry very little weight anyway, because the pelvic organs are resting further forward, on top of the pubic bone, and against the lower wall of the abdomen. You can read more about this in Christine Kent’s book, Saving the Whole Woman, available from the online store at this site. Also from the FAQ’s on the homepage.
Yes, post-menopausal women do often have vaginal thinning. Does this mean that Incostress should not be used by post-menopausal women without the support of oestogen cream? What about perimenopausal women and women in the second half of the menstrual cycle when dryness can cause irritation? Wouldn’t a normal over-the counter personal lubricant work? Many women don’t want to use topical oestrogen, as its effect can be systemic, and lead to serious health risks if you don’t take progesterone as well. This starts to sound like fullblown HRT to me, which is a pretty big step to take in order to be able to use the Incostress pessary.
I am not saying the Incostress is not a good product, and I do hope you get some women who will trial it for you, as it looks like it could have benefit, though it looks from the instruction leaflet that it would not sit above the pelvic floor muscles at all (if you connect a line from the pubic bone to the tip of the coccyx), unless it was inserted higher in the vagina, where it was nowhere near the urethra. I can now see how it would be difficult to retain for a woman with pelvic organ prolapse if inserted only to the position illustrated.
However, a woman with pelvic organ prolapse may be able to benefit from using it higher in the vagina as an adjunct to Wholewoman posture. Some of our Members are currently experimenting with different types of tampons as pessaries for POP, which is a similar principle to the Incostress. Some of the medically supplied pessaries are difficult to remove or insert, and it would be nice to have a pessary that is not dependent on prescription, fitting and removal by a health professional. I guess it is only going to be time and further testing that will determine its final use, and further development.
Can you see it ultimately being available in different sizes (maybe a longer, flexible version that might help women with POP as it could be worn higher in the vagina, but still apply pressure to the urethra, if that is the aim? After all, probably most women who experience stress incontinence do seem to have have a degree of POP, whether they know it or not, and it would be a pity to exclude them from using it, if it could be potentially useful with some design modification.
I have wondered for some time why somebody doesn’t just market a pessary direct to women? Why has it always been through a doctor only in the past, whatever purpose the pessary is designed for?
Looks like the world is not flat, after all!
Cheers
Louise
Clonmacnoise
March 3, 2008 - 5:35am
Permalink
The world may still be flat...
Louise,
Thanks for your kindness about my mother.
I've been watching this Incostress thing with interest, and I looked it up it on the site, and couldn't tell how big it was. Not good on centimeters - too American I guess. Looks like an interesting shape, however. Not sure about the tail. The tampon felt OK, but drew blood - maybe the strings?
I suppose I'm concerned that there is a separation between creating this for stress incontinence and neglecting the other pelvic floor failures. It seems to me that medicine is once again treating particular symptoms but failing to get to the source of the problem, which makes for a revolving door scheme of treatment.
I'm a big source person. If you have POP or any body breakdown, then find out what the failure is, and try to treat it at the top of the mountain at the stream rather than down in the delta, and use sense and sensibility, to quote Austin. A little weight loss, exercise, diet, posture and positive thinking all help pop - surgery will not, so what exactly are we talking about? I believe that's called a way of life - new and difficult for some people.
So many of us have bladder prolapse, rectocele, cervical drop and a host of other little pelvic nasties, it seems that the ten years that it took to create this thing would address more than stress incontinence.
Anyway the Incostress is $49.00. That's a lot for a tiny bit of plastic. Might try the tampon shell...
Judy
Incostress
March 3, 2008 - 11:15pm
Permalink
United we stand. Women
United we stand. Women supporting each other for a better quality of life
Dear Judy,
Im not surprised the tampon drew blood. If you were using the tampon outside of its recommended use, it is possilbe the vagina could have been so dry that the fibers of the tampon would have stuck to the lining tearing it on removal.
I would like to point out that Incostress is designed for stress incontinence only, it could improve pelvic tone over time but this isn't its main function.
I agree fully with you that women need to find out what the failure is and why it failed then proceed to address solving this problem in the correct manner.
I would like to point out that 10 years wasn't spent on 'creating this thing' 10 years was spent on helping my mum,researching into incontinence and other pelvic problems,carrying out clinical trials, searching and studying every material possible to make this device safe for women to use, holding focus groups to bring about awareness of the problems women face and studying to become the manufacturer.(all self funded through me holding down 2 jobs to pay for it) This took all this time because I did it single handed with no backing of anyone. Normally when a medical product is brought to the market it has the backing of finance from large medical companies.
I would like to point out that Incostress is not a tiny piece of plastic, it is made from a high quality medical grade silicone. Incostress is a recognised medical device which holds all the certification.
$49.00 for this reusable device to control stress incontinence is a lot cheaper than your usual monthly supply of incontinence pads, (and pads only hide the problem not control it)
The price is relative.
If you do use tampons to control your incontinence I would urge you to think again, purly for the reason of TSS and use of the tampon outside it's prescribed use.
Due to Incostress being made of silicone, this makes this product inert.
Hope this helps
Incostress
March 3, 2008 - 11:35pm
Permalink
United we stand. Women
United we stand. Women supporting each other for a better quality of life
Hi Louise,
thank you for your comments. What you say is correct and you put explain the pelvic muscles in a great way.
I keep stressing that Incostress is there to close the urethra from the vagina and is there as a support. It is not a pelvic floor exerciser which a lot of people seem to have this idea. Yes over time it could help strengthen the pelvic muscles, but primarily it is there to stop involuntary leakage.
It is not designed for women with prolapes and I do not see it being of benifit to these women, which is what I tell any woman who asks me. ( I truly wish it was)
As every woman is unique post menopause women do use Incostress without any problems. It was suggested to me by physiotherapists and doctors that a vaginal oestrogen cream could be used if the lining is too thin. I always ask women to seek medical advice if they are in any doubt.
At the moment, there is no need for 2 sizes. (We tried with a smaller size in the clinical trials, but this was too small and had little effect)
Women with POP were excluded from the clinical trials.
We had a 90% success rate with women using the incostress, 37% of women were taken off the surgery waiting list thanks to Incostress.
I would like to work with anyone who has a prolapse in designing a product to help this condition. All ideas would be very welcome.
Thanks again for your interest
louiseds
March 3, 2008 - 11:50pm
Permalink
Hey Sue
Hi Sue
Have you got your sample Incostress yet? If so, how are you finding it?
Cheers
Louise
louiseds
March 4, 2008 - 12:16am
Permalink
My queries
Hl Incostress
You keep saying that Incostress is primarily for involuntary leakage, and not suitable for women with POP, and women with POP were excluded from clinical trials. Just wondering why you are promoting it so heavily on a Web Forum for women with prolapse. As far as I know, all the women here are here for reasons of prolapse, while some may have stress incontinence as a part of prolapse, but because of their prolapses are not able to use it. Is that right?
Re the need for different sizes, if you could develop a larger size? That would be flexible enough to accommodate pelvic organs moving around a lot, high enough to keep the top part of the vagina up high, but coming down far enough to be able to support the urethra down at and below the level of the pelvic floor. Now that *might* work for both purposes, if stress incontinence is indeed a problem. Many women are put off pessaries as a support for POP because they can't find one that suits them, and they can't insert and remove them themselves. I think the medical devices industry could do better for women with POP, with the way they sell them through medical practitioners only, and how they are designed to need repeated visits to the doctor.
I am interested to know more about your clinical research. Could you please post a link to the full clinical trial report?
Cheers
Louise
Incostress
March 4, 2008 - 1:26am
Permalink
United we stand. Women
United we stand. Women supporting each other for a better quality of life
Very good points on the design of a new pessary. I will certainly look into this in more detail.
I am not promoting Incostress on this site for women with POP. I was invited here by one of your members (and very glad to be here as I am learning so much)
The lady in question emailed me, where I did say Incostress would not be of benefit to her problem, however from her emails I really felt for her and sent a free sample as I would never sell to anyone I genuinely thought my product would not be of any benefit.
If it does work I would be over the moon and would be happy to go further in helping women with POP with my product.
Not enough is done to help women with POP, and I personally would like to do more through my company .
Incostress when first trialled was called Inco-Stop one of the pulications can be found http://www.springerlink.com/content/r3273x5x53345775/
It was presented in Athens 2006 by Singleton hospital Swansea and the department of Life Science Univeristy of Wales Swansea at IUGA.
Kind regards
Gaynor
louiseds
March 4, 2008 - 5:15am
Permalink
Clinical research
Hi Gaynor
I found the trial results. They were very telling. It is great that some women found Incostress helpful enough to continue to use it at least for a full month.
I did note that 8 of the 20 women could not retain the device, which I kind of expected. I imagine that this is partly the low positioning of the Incostress and partly due to the insidious nature of pelvic organ prolapse, which is often asymptomatic, or not evident all the time. It can creep up on you over a number of years, and not be obvious at all, certainly not affecting the way you live your life. On the other hand the organs can literally descend overnight which would, and is, horrifying for a woman to experience.
Stress urinary incontinence is one of the telltale symptoms of POP, though not the only cause, I think. It may be that Incostress is suitable for a particular group of women with stress urinary incontinence from other causes.
Retention of any pessary is a challenge when you have POP, which is part of the reason why professional help is often needed for insertion and removal. They just have to design them to stay in!
I have found that posture improvement, clothing design, pelvic floor exercises and other whole body exercises work OK for me to keep my continence at an OK level without the use of pads and other things. I guess as I get older I am less inclined to do things like kick-boxing and tuckjumps; more inclined towards exercise with smoother smoother movement. Menstrual tampons have been off my shopping list for years, so I don't think I would be a candidate for Incostress.
Best wishes as you continue to develop this pessary.
Louise
MeMyselfAndI
March 4, 2008 - 1:09pm
Permalink
Tested the Incostress
Unfortunately it fell out and could not be retained.
I thank you for sending it to me to test though. It is a real shame that it just comes out in moments :-(
Shame
Sue
Lord grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change. The courage to change the things I can. And the wisdom to know the difference
Look into the eyes - They hold the key.
http://www.bringmadeleinehome.com/img/maddy544x150Banner.jpg
louiseds
March 4, 2008 - 11:10pm
Permalink
Tested the Incostress
Hi Sue
Did you only try it in the position illustrated in the brochure, or did you try it higher up in the vagina?
Cheers
Louise
Clonmacnoise
March 5, 2008 - 5:59am
Permalink
OOPS!
Gaynor,
Nobody respects the kind of work you are doing than I do primarily because I've put together a school for very young children without any backing or support either. I know all the difficulties, and they are not easy, so many many kudos.
Forging out by yourself to accomplish anything is a tightrope of emotional ups and downs that break or make the women who try it. Please don't let this forum seem like a test of your strength. We are very serious about what we know and what we think and especially irritated by what the medical profession as done to fail us.
Personally, I was surprised the tampon drew blood because I'm not dry. Crazypause did not leave me dry.
I don't have any stress incontinence at all. I can laugh, jump, sneeze and run without losing a drop. I think it's because I exercise doing yoga. I'm in very good physical shape for a woman my age.
I have an annoying bladder prolapse which gets on my nerves sometimes when I'm on my feet 10 hours, and I thought your product would be helpful - like the tampon.
As far as the $49.00 goes, I read it was a monthly charge. I don't use any medications, have extravagant tastes except for food, and in the old days, I could make a box of tampons go 6 months, so $49.00 does seem like a bunch.
Thanks for your work; it really does mean a lot.
Judy
MeMyselfAndI
March 5, 2008 - 8:03am
Permalink
Incostress test
Tried both - Soon as you walk a few steps it slides downwards - And exits.
Lord grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change. The courage to change the things I can. And the wisdom to know the difference
Look into the eyes - They hold the key.
http://www.bringmadeleinehome.com/img/maddy544x150Banner.jpg
louiseds
March 6, 2008 - 5:43am
Permalink
incostress test
B%#$er.
L