A new era of women’s health is dawning. In this new age women will have access to technological imagery that allows them to clearly see the placement of their pelvic organs in standing posture.
Indeed, Dr. Lauri Romanzi tells us that day has already arrived: “You may be pleased to learn that much of contemporary anatomic renderings are indeed based on vertical imaging of living women using high-def sonography and dynamic MRI.”
Hurray!! Women everywhere must call their doctors to find where these imaging centers are! Finally we will be able to see for ourselves our true anatomy and how posture, coupled with intraabdominal pressure, work together to either pin our organs into position or blow them out of our body. How marvelous that women will finally have access to indisputable answers to their deepest anatomic questions. If you are given excuses why a standing MRI in Whole Woman Posture is not allowed, demand that it be done!
Only in this way will we be able to solve the riddle of why doctors like L. Romanzi insist on perpetuating anatomic unrealities such as the figure at left. Women know differently! All it takes is a quick reach inside our vagina to understand that our pubic bones are not directly under our navel!
We have paid a high price for the blunt instruments of modern medical technology. For once there is a truly non-invasive, high-tech way to see into the body and gain information of real value. Every curious woman should have access to it.
However, it does not take an Einsteinian “thought experiment”, or even an MRI, to prove to women the workings of their pelvic anatomy. Try this:
Stand up and reach your right hand around to the back of your body (not through your legs.) Using the first two fingers of your right hand, press firmly against (not inside) your vaginal opening. Use all the fingertips of your left hand to press deeply into your lower belly - about 2-3 centimeters above your pubic hairline. If you have a lot of belly fat press hard into the muscle layer. Now either cough or bear down.
Although we have always been told the pelvic floor takes the brunt of intraabdominal pressure, you can see by this experiment that there is actually more outward movement of your belly than your pelvic diaphragm. Clinicians who routinely view women in the lithotomy position only see movement of the pelvic diaphragm when they ask women to bear down. Because of their limited perspective, they have an incomplete concept of female pelvic organ support, believing the pelvic floor is the primary receiver of intraabdominal pressure and therefore solely responsible for preventing prolapse. In reality, the lower abdominal wall takes most of the force of intraabdominal pressure. The pelvic floor shares - albeit less than equally - that role. With every breath we take the pelvic organs are being pushed into the rounded lower belly.
Although we have sometimes referred to the organs as being positioned “over the pubic bones”, this has been an expedient in helping women understand they have no “hole” at the bottom of their torso over which their pelvic organs are precariously perched. The pelvic outlet is at the back of the body and in normal anatomy the cervix is positioned directly over and high above the pubic bones, with the body of the uterus near the lower abdominal wall.
Gynecologists and urogynecologists will finally be able to help women see these concepts for themselves through standing MRI. Insist on access to this technology.
The standing MRI will also allow women to see that pessaries, such as the Colpexin Sphere, hold the vaginal walls open and in doing so allow internal pressures to squeeze neighboring organs into the vaginal space. In real time women will be able to see a developing rectocele before their very eyes!
What they won’t be able to see is the toxicity of the plastic pessary.
The polycarbonate Colpexin Sphere was developed by the medical supply company, Adamed, located in Warsaw, Poland. The device is marketed to women through urogynecologists - many of whom hold stock in the company. It is the first plastic pessary to be given serious attention by some doctors in the U.S. For many decades FDA approved pessaries have been made strictly from medical grade solid silicone - an inert, non-toxic material.
Bishenol-A (BPA) is the building block of polycarbonate plastic and is ubiquitous in our culture in the form of baby bottles, re-useable water bottles, and countless other household items. Numerous studies have found that BPA leaches from these sources and it was first recognized in the 1990‘s that the plasticizer is causing serious endocrine disruption in both humans and the natural world. In August 2007, over 30 scientific experts on BPA, known as the Chapel Hill Panel, published a consensus statement in the peer-reviewed journal Reproductive Toxicology, illuminating the adverse health effects occurring in animals at levels within the range of exposure that is typical for humans living in developed countries. Those effects include:
- Endocrine disruption
- Recurrent miscarriage
- Altered mammary gland development
- Altered brain development and behavior
- Insulin resistance
Recent studies have linked exposure to the estrogenic actions of BPA to increased incidence of breast cancer throughout the developed world. Bisphenol molecules have also been verified in 63.8% of endometriotic women.
Even before science identified BPA as a major health concern, plastic was never considered a reasonable material to be placed vaginally.
Bisphenol-A polycarbonate has been commercially available since the 1960s, and its use in medical devices dates from approximately that time. The hard, clear plastic can be found as valves, tube fittings, and syringes. Although the Colpexin Sphere is marketed as “medical grade” plastic, there is no difference in BPA levels between this and any other polycarbonate product.
The fact that BPA is leaching from food cans, drink cartons and water bottles is a major health concern worldwide. That some providers of women’s healthcare would even consider placing a plastic ball for long periods of time within the acidic and highly absorptive environment of the vagina is shocking and untenable. If your doctor prescribes and is heavily marketing the Colpexin Sphere it is reasonable to ask whether she/he holds stock in Adamed.
In fact, the time has come for all women to request from their doctors full disclosure of the medical and pharmaceutical companies in which these practitioners hold shares or to whom they consult. It is sobering to learn of the incestuous relationship between doctors and the companies that pay them for professional marketing of their products and the conflict of interest that represents between doctors and the women they serve.
Here is a list of just a few of our most prominent gynecologists and some of the companies they work for, have worked for, or hold stock in:
- J.O.L. DeLancey: Consultant for: Johnson & Johnson, SURx, Gynecare, Kimberly Clark, Lilly Pharmaceuticals, Bio Logic Engineering.
- P.K. Sand: Consultant for: Ortho, McNeil Pharmaceutical, Watson Pharmaceuticals, American Medical Systems, Indevus Pharmaceuticals, Yamanouchi, Pfizer, Boston Scientific,
Roche, Mentor, Bioform. Professional speaker for: American Medical Systems, Boston Scientific, Ortho, McNeil Pharmaceutical, Watson Pharmaceuticals.
- G.W. Davila: Consultant for: AMS, Tyco/US Surgical, Watson Pharmaceuticals, Warner-Chilcott/Galen, Protein Polymer Technologies, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Synovis, Roche.
- M.L. Polan: Consultant for: Berlex, Proctor & Gamble, Dupont. Shareholder: Wyeth, Quidel.
- G.W. Cundiff: Consultant for: Lilly Pharmaceuticals
The problem with the medical system is that it is run by doctors and policed by doctors. The system and the research is all funded by big pharma which has only one agenda: create more pills, equipment and supplies for doctors to prescribe, use or consume on their typically unwitting patients. There is no oversight of the system by any parties who are not the product of the system or embedded in it. It has a life of its own and its interests are not at any level necessarily aligned with the interests of women.
Nowhere is the expression caveat emptor (let the buyer beware) more relevant than in medical services.
(Inaccurate Anatomy illustration is from Dr. Romanzi's blog and the Colpexin Sphere illustration from Adamed)
Comments
Oceanblue
September 5, 2009 - 11:20pm
Permalink
Yet another informative post by Christine!
Thank you for the most informative posting Christine.
Always most informative, and out into the open, to make all aware.
And that is precisely how it should be.
Thank you,
Hugs,
Oceanblue
Judith
September 6, 2009 - 3:22am
Permalink
MRIs, spheres and sea sponges
Thanks Christine, that was a really clear explanation of the effect of the sphere. Are sea sponges less damaging because they don't force the vaginal walls apart or are they also not a great idea?
Re MRI in standing, I don't know whether that's available in UK, I'll have to look into it. I suppose it's only if more women ask for it that obgyns will come around (possibly) to WW theory. I still find it unbelievable that there can be such a gross misconception of female anatomy and function in this day and age. To me it illustrates how medical knowledge or supposition from way back when passes into medical lore unless and until it's proved to be wrong (which can take a very long time to do)and many times has no scientific basis. Apart from being potentially damaging, it's particularly annoying because alternative therapies are often accused of having no scientific basis and it's widely assumed that everything in modern medicine has. Judith
louiseds
September 6, 2009 - 4:50am
Permalink
The next chapter
I wonder why they did decide to manufacture it out of polycarbonate instead of medical grade silicon? What a dumb idea!
Thanks for the explanation about the Colpexin Sphere and rectocele.
This vertical MRI thing will be interesting, particularly when they see what is really happening in the female pelvis. No doubt they will say that this new imaging technology has enabled them to see previously undiscovered features of female pelvic anatomy, that will revolutionise treatment and mamagement of pelvic organ prolapse and reduce the number of women needing pelvic reconstructive surgery. I can't wait!!
Robin, I agree with you about treatments that are 'scientifically' tested. This sort of thing really is a wakeup call for people who 'trust' doctors and pharmaceutical medicines, but 'distrust' alternative therapies. Hopefully people will become more aware that their interests are not necessarily paramount when a treatment is prescribed. All the more case for doing your own research before accepting any recommendations at all. It is very difficulty to know who to trust, but in an environment where you cannot trust any party absolutely, the more information the better is my motto!
Cheers
Louise
EDIT: Sorry Judith, cross out Robin. She doesn't exist.
Judith
September 6, 2009 - 6:42am
Permalink
I'm not Robin
Did you mean me or is there a Robin somewhere? Judith xxx
Judith
September 6, 2009 - 6:57am
Permalink
Modern medicine not always based on science
I also meant to add that I've heard of numerous cases of medical practice that were never based on scientific evidence in the first place but found their way into medical cannon simply because they continued to be used over a long period of time. Apparently, using the height of the fundus to assess size of baby during pregnancy is one of them. This is probably less common now that pregnant women get ultrasounds - where's the scientific evidence that this is perfectly safe for the baby? Another thing to be aware of is that some medical practices may have been thrown into doubt but, until there is enough scientific proof that they are unsafe, they are not discontinued or suitable advice isn't given. Pregnant women were given X rays long after the safety of this was questioned. The link between smoking and respiratory disease was known about long before official advice was given. We had to wait for conclusive proof.
I think that everyone needs to be aware that many practices or drugs that we assume to be safe simply haven't been researched enough. Like Louise, I would never accept anything I am told as gospel but use my common sense and intuition. Drugs don't have side effects, this is a euphemism. They have effects, some intended, some not.
That's why it's so welcome to have people who question the dogma and do their own research eg Christine. Sadly, I think that Louise is probably right and that any adjustments in anatomical theory arising from the use of new technology woll be claimed as a new medical breakthrough. Judith
louiseds
September 6, 2009 - 8:40am
Permalink
Medical breakthrough
Hi *Judith*
I don't mind if it is ultimately claimed as a medical breakthrough, as long as Christine is hailed as the pioneer of this thinking, and that women are encouraged by their doctors to use their own WW posture as a first line of defence against POP symptoms in conjunction with the other Wholewoman techniques, and saved from needless, irreversible surgical procedures. The whole package!
I have seen too many good ideas poo-pooed by establishment, and only taken on board after establishment were able to get credit for thinking them up. We are a strange species!
L
Oceanblue
September 6, 2009 - 8:33pm
Permalink
Agreed! We are indeed a strange species!
Thank you Louise, we must grow and stand together in support of Christine's pioneering of POP.
In WW posture of course!
Yes!
Oceanblue
bad_mirror
December 4, 2009 - 5:11pm
Permalink
WW
WW = Whole Woman
:-)
trueblueone
January 30, 2010 - 11:14am
Permalink
Pessaries
This past week I have continued to learn and grow with this website and I thank everyone, most especially Christine. Monday is the day when I visit my gyn and now I feel ready to face the realities of the real "system". I have always been dubious regarding decisions made by doctors as to their true vested interests. Seeing this here I know I am correct. This week has been my dilemma, "to pessary or not to pessary" that was my question. Considering the fact I do not believe my condition to be so advanced, and if this is all they have to offer (BPA infused devices and as Colpexin Sphere 'fillers') I will pass. Not worth destroying what I feel up to this point has been a very good body to be living in. Once again, I am so thankful to have found this site!