When I first “cracked the code” on stabilizing and reversing prolapse, and wrote and published Saving the Whole Woman, I set up this forum. While I had finally gotten my own severe uterine prolapse under control with the knowledge I had gained, I didn’t actually know if I could teach other women to do for themselves what I had done for my condition.
So I just started teaching women on this forum. Within weeks, the women started writing back, “It’s working! I can feel the difference!”
From that moment on, the forum became the hub of the Whole Woman Community. Unfortunately, spammers also discovered the forum, along with the thousands of women we had been helping. The level of spamming became so intolerable and time-consuming, we regretfully took the forum down.
Technology never sleeps, however, and we have better tools today for controlling spam than we did just a few years ago. So I am very excited and pleased to bring the forum back online.
If you are already a registered user you may now log in and post. If you have lost your password, just click the request new password tab and follow the directions.
Please review and agree to the disclaimer and the forum rules. Our moderators will remove any posts that are promotional or otherwise fail to meet our guidelines and will block repeat offenders.
Remember, the forum is here for two reasons. First, to get your questions answered by other women who have knowledge and experience to share. Second, it is the place to share your results and successes. Your stories will help other women learn that Whole Woman is what they need.
Whether you’re an old friend or a new acquaintance, welcome! The Whole Woman forum is a place where you can make a difference in your own life and the lives of thousands of women around the world!
Best wishes,
Christine Kent
Founder
Whole Woman
Christine
December 16, 2009 - 10:10am
Permalink
we Must do this..
Louise was going to look into it for us - I think it's quite a process to post. How about if we make it a goal for 2010!!
kiki
December 17, 2009 - 12:30am
Permalink
Definately!!!
Quick google makes it look quite easy..
create an account
search for what you want. if there is nothing there, you click on a button to write an article.
if there is something there you want to edit, you can edit it
more details here
Wikipedia information
and here
Wikipedia make a page
haven't actually read them by the way, so they may say you have to stand on your head and do a jig--no idea ;-)
articles will be deleted if not fairly neutral so need to be very information based, and can be edited at any time...
great goal for the new year!!!
louiseds
December 26, 2009 - 6:59am
Permalink
wikipedia
Yes, I did look into it, and discovered that it is not as simple as it sounds. Wikipedia editing is not for the faint hearted, as there is only a small percentage of wikipedia editors who do the bulk of the editing, and new editors don't have much clout. You can't just edit articles without consulting with the original authors, or they revert back to the old version. It is not easy to get dialog going when people have moved on, and may not even have the same email address as they had when they wrote the original articles. There are lots of protocols and policies to follow.
It seems that Wikipedia has become so big and cumbersome that it doesn't work very well any more. It is all done by volunteers. I put it in the too hard basket at the time because Wikipedia was under a bit of a cloud at the time, and looked like getting worse. I couldn't get any responses from authors of the articles related to POP. I was astounded at some of the inaccuracies and typos, but could not commit the time or effort needed to wade through the protocols of each edit I wanted to make, and there would have been at least 20 separate edits, from memory. I guess I just figured that there were other less frustrating ways of getting word out.
I am sorry, but I am not prepared to go down that road. Have a look Kiki, and tell me if you think I am on the right track in deciding that Wikipedia editing is like tilting at windmills.
Louise