When I first “cracked the code” on stabilizing and reversing prolapse, and wrote and published Saving the Whole Woman, I set up this forum. While I had finally gotten my own severe uterine prolapse under control with the knowledge I had gained, I didn’t actually know if I could teach other women to do for themselves what I had done for my condition.
So I just started teaching women on this forum. Within weeks, the women started writing back, “It’s working! I can feel the difference!”
From that moment on, the forum became the hub of the Whole Woman Community. Unfortunately, spammers also discovered the forum, along with the thousands of women we had been helping. The level of spamming became so intolerable and time-consuming, we regretfully took the forum down.
Technology never sleeps, however, and we have better tools today for controlling spam than we did just a few years ago. So I am very excited and pleased to bring the forum back online.
If you are already a registered user you may now log in and post. If you have lost your password, just click the request new password tab and follow the directions.
Please review and agree to the disclaimer and the forum rules. Our moderators will remove any posts that are promotional or otherwise fail to meet our guidelines and will block repeat offenders.
Remember, the forum is here for two reasons. First, to get your questions answered by other women who have knowledge and experience to share. Second, it is the place to share your results and successes. Your stories will help other women learn that Whole Woman is what they need.
Whether you’re an old friend or a new acquaintance, welcome! The Whole Woman forum is a place where you can make a difference in your own life and the lives of thousands of women around the world!
Best wishes,
Christine Kent
Founder
Whole Woman
granolamom
November 8, 2011 - 9:03pm
Permalink
scorn
well, I find the term 'advanced maternal age' scornful, especially since they begin to use it at age 35 or so.
age does have statistical significance when applied to pregnancy, there are no guarantees in life whichever way you slice it. If it were me, and I felt mentally and physically strong, if both myself and my husband desperately wanted it, I'd go for another one.
I know lots of 'older mothers' but apparently I am in the minority here. its not unheard of in my circles for a woman to be pregnant at the same time as her daughter (not common, but not unheard of). so long as you trust your health care provider to provide good quality care, who cares if the medical profession at large is scornful?
alemama
November 8, 2011 - 9:48pm
Permalink
I had to look
and the thing is- it doesn't look great, what I could find about elderly pregnancy. But I'd probably do it anyway :)
My feeling when reading about it though is that 42 is still pretty young ( I know any age after 35 they call old but...). I read all about the world's oldest woman to have a baby at 72! and another woman in her 60s had triplets.
You probably won't get scorned by the midwives here, they see plenty of moms. And. I know a handful myself who had kiddos in the early 40s and the kids (all girls- actually I think that's one of the statistics- more girls are born to older men) are healthy and beautiful and two were actually born at home, unassisted.
I'm sorry for your loss.
bad_mirror
November 8, 2011 - 10:32pm
Permalink
Advanced maternal age
Scornful? Nah -- older moms are big business for the birthing industry in the US of A, what with all the extra testing that is generally "required" and the pushing of IVF treatments. I know loads of "old" moms in my area. I don't think anyone will discourage you, being 42 and having other children. Just beware it may be quite a fight to have an unmanaged birth. Homebirth may or may not be available to you, depending on where you live ( if this is even a desire of yours, that is). As for your body and prolapse, as long as you can have a gentle birth where you are in charge, I bet you will be absolutely fine!